Monday, 11 November 2013

Gaz Coombes' November shows: acoustics, reverb, space, sound and magic


Before music was put more fully in the hands of the people, 'new music' was commissioned for specific events, and hence fairly specific locations. The composer was either already working on the music in the location itself, or the location for the finished piece was in mind from the start - there was a relationship between music, and place. 
In the case of churches: music, emerging from chant, was part of a calling out to a higher force - a calling in song which would always receive its response enshrouded with reverb - as architecture and acoustics play with textures, frequencies and note elongation mysteriously, and seeming magically, in a special place.

Gaz has shaped the new arrangements of the songs, the new line-up, and the way we we will be playing them, with the locations of the four shows in mind. Salford St Philips, Glasgow Oran Mor, Leeds Holy Trinity, and London Union Chapel - each place we will find ourselves in has its own acoustic properties: an 'original shell' of sound quality unique to the location, which becomes activated when a sound event occurs. When you record sound, the acoustic properties of the space define the sound itself. The acoustic space of the Motown recording live room is as much part of every hit as the instruments and musicians themselves, (albeit with some compression). Different spaces create different perspectives of the same music or song. It is almost as if you are getting a different 'mix' in each place, as it reveals, highlights, or mutes certain aspects. This is simple science - certain sound waves or frequencies are favoured or cancelled out depending on the dimensions or building materials of the room - but it means that not only do you never really hear the same version twice, it is almost a new version in each place.

And it is the transcendental quality of natural reverb that often 'sets free' the music, the sound, in a way that you might not expect. To meet deadlines and to feed the industry as a matter of necessity: in the recording studio sound is kidnapped, bound and gagged, manipulated by processes, software, by machinery, warped until it fits the producer's or artist's directives, until it is 'the right sound'. Then when you take the music out live, you are suddenly at the mercy of the space itself. Some of the O2 academies that we played in on the last tour were awful: booming, square, soulless places - can you really 'hear' music here..? And what of the sense of occasion? Are we being directed by the sponsors of the venue, who are more interested in squeezing our 'consumer group' for as much cash as they can, or are we experiencing something unique with the artist in a place chosen by them?

There will be new songs, a new set up, and we will be using very new Allen & Heath desk complete with onstage monitors mixers. But even as we make an inadvertent nod to our nation's musical past, choosing these venues is not a 'going back', but instead it is a move to the future - a way to really 'hear' music again after years of saturation - as once again an 'event' in a 'place'.

You want to hear something new? Come see us - choose your location!



Monday, 22 July 2013

Twitter ye not! (on either side...)


@Tim_Burgess & @rycurran16 - got an interesting point there! I have to admit that I feel like (for want of a better word) a complete charlatan, tweeting my activities - especially when it feels like I'm just 'selling' myself to my followers. Do they want to hear this? - I might be potentially boring them with information they possibly already know or don't care about. But it is part of being a modern musician today, to keep people up to date with what you're doing…and most importantly to spread the word so that the casual tweeter or visitor checking in on you will find out what you're up to. 

But there are at least two angles here - following the artist because you want to share their thoughts, and following the artist so you keep up to date with their work.

I'm certainly more reticent than most, but if I don't put this information out online - I don't exist on the Internet. Most of us live our lives satisfying curiosity now with a casual Google, or Twitter check - if there's nothing there, and if it isn't informative, then no-one will know. Some of you will know this and some not, but I am the drummer for Gaz Coombes, and as an example, a recent tour with Gaz saw us astounded that people still didn't know that we were playing live that night their home town, after we'd all felt like we'd sold our souls to tweeting, re-tweeing, Facebooking, linking to Gaz's website, and old-time promoting on our tour. STILL they didn't know, time after time (many didn't even know there was an album out!). So you can see why artists sometimes 'say they are bout to do something, say they are doing it and then say that they've done it'!

'Advertising' to followers doesn't make sense when your followers just like you for who you are and love hearing your thoughts - I can see how switching up from sharing thoughts to a generic promotion would seem like the old concept of 'selling out'. Noel Gallagher's twitter feed is also an example of this. But Tim has always been a good tweeter - a hilarious one! And he's maintained his output. He is one of the few where his thoughts are more interesting and funny than any 'press release' style of information (the Lance Armstrong bike Tweet is one of my favourite ever, possibly).

Part of Twitter is that it is so personal, so 'real-time' - it appears to allow a closeness to the person you're following. Twitter opens things up, but this can mean it opens a bigger window, for good, for bad… We've arrived at a classic moment here, where original followers sense a shift and don't like it - part of what's brilliant about it is that it reduces the barrier between star and fan - but this can be equally problematic !

Ultimately: Don't knock Tim for doing what he should do as a modern day musician - promoting what he's doing and keeping his followers informed. But on the other hand don't knock @rycurran and @SidFishes doing for what they should do - noting what they think is going on - expressing opinions in a democratic online discussion, one not restricted by hierarchical mores - and where truth is everything.